Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Grok 4.7 wins on 4/4 benchmarks
Grok 4.7 wins 4 of 4 shared benchmarks. Leads in general · knowledge · math.
Category leads
general·Grok 4.7knowledge·Grok 4.7math·Grok 4.7
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Grok 4.7
#107 by perf·#16 by attention
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
#135 by perf·#2 by attention
Best value
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
9.8x better value than Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
13.2 pts/$
$4.00/M
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
129.5 pts/$
$0.38/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
xAI
$250.0B·Tier 1
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
4 benchmarks · 2 models
Grok 4.7Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Dtbench
Grok 4.7 leads by +55.1
Grok 4.7
93.3
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
38.2
GPQA diamond
Grok 4.7 leads by +58.1
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Grok 4.7
90.3
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
32.2
Lmca
Grok 4.7 leads by +42.3
Grok 4.7
58.1
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
15.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Grok 4.7 leads by +90.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Grok 4.7
98.0
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
8.0
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
Dtbench | 93.3 | 38.2 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 90.3 | 32.2 |
Lmca | 58.1 | 15.8 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 98.0 | 8.0 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.00 | $6.00 | 500K tokens (~250 books) | $30.00 | |
| $0.36 | $0.40 | 33K tokens (~16 books) | $3.70 |