Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.3
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
GLM 5.3 wins on 11/20 benchmarks
GLM 5.3 wins 11 of 20 shared benchmarks. Leads in speed · agentic · coding.
Category leads
speed·GLM 5.3agentic·GLM 5.3knowledge·Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewcoding·GLM 5.3general·Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewmath·GLM 5.3
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#146 by perf·#6 by attention
GLM 5.3
#70 by perf·#3 by attention
Best value
GLM 5.3
3.4x better value than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
6.9 pts/$
$7.00/M
GLM 5.3
23.3 pts/$
$2.42/M
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Google DeepMind
$4.27T·Tier 1
z-ai
private · undisclosed
Head to head
20 benchmarks · 2 models
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGLM 5.3
Artificial Analysis · CritPt
GLM 5.3 leads by +1.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
17.7
GLM 5.3
19.1
Artificial Analysis · GDPval
GLM 5.3 leads by +42.9
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
14.6
GLM 5.3
57.5
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +2.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
94.1
GLM 5.3
91.7
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +4.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
47.0
GLM 5.3
42.3
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +2.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
82.0
GLM 5.3
79.7
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index
GLM 5.3 leads by +15.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
29.7
GLM 5.3
44.8
Artificial Analysis · SciCode
GLM 5.3 leads by +0.3
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
58.7
GLM 5.3
59.0
APEX-Agents
GLM 5.3 leads by +21.3
APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
35.3
GLM 5.3
56.6
Chess Puzzles
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +18.9
Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
52.6
GLM 5.3
33.7
Deepswe
GLM 5.3 leads by +57.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
11.7
GLM 5.3
69.0
Dtbench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +15.7
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.1
GLM 5.3
79.5
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private
GLM 5.3 leads by +2.4
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.8
GLM 5.3
29.3
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private
GLM 5.3 leads by +9.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
59.6
GLM 5.3
68.8
GPQA diamond
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +4.7
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
92.6
GLM 5.3
87.9
Lmca
GLM 5.3 leads by +2.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
63.3
GLM 5.3
65.3
Mystery Game Puzzles
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +1.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
27.3
GLM 5.3
26.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +4.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
95.6
GLM 5.3
91.1
Proofbench
GLM 5.3 leads by +23.0
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
26.0
GLM 5.3
49.0
SimpleQA Verified
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads by +32.5
SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
73.5
GLM 5.3
41.0
WeirdML
GLM 5.3 leads by +3.3
WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
72.1
GLM 5.3
75.4
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GLM 5.3 |
|---|---|---|
Artificial Analysis · CritPt | 17.7 | 19.1 |
Artificial Analysis · GDPval | 14.6 | 57.5 |
Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond | 94.1 | 91.7 |
Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam | 47.0 | 42.3 |
Artificial Analysis · Long Context Reasoning | 82.0 | 79.7 |
Artificial Analysis · Quality Index | 29.7 | 44.8 |
Artificial Analysis · SciCode | 58.7 | 59.0 |
APEX-Agents APEX-Agents · evaluates AI agents on complex, multi-step tasks requiring planning, tool use, and autonomous decision-making in realistic environments. | 35.3 | 56.6 |
Chess Puzzles Chess Puzzles · tests strategic and tactical reasoning by having models solve chess puzzle positions, evaluating lookahead and pattern recognition abilities. | 52.6 | 33.7 |
Deepswe | 11.7 | 69.0 |
Dtbench | 95.1 | 79.5 |
FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private | 26.8 | 29.3 |
FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private | 59.6 | 68.8 |
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 92.6 | 87.9 |
Lmca | 63.3 | 65.3 |
Mystery Game Puzzles | 27.3 | 26.2 |
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · simulated American Invitational Mathematics Examination problems testing advanced problem-solving skills. | 95.6 | 91.1 |
Proofbench | 26.0 | 49.0 |
SimpleQA Verified SimpleQA Verified · short factual questions with verified answers, measuring factual accuracy and the tendency to hallucinate or provide incorrect information. | 73.5 | 41.0 |
WeirdML WeirdML · tests models on unusual and adversarial machine learning tasks that require creative problem-solving beyond standard patterns. | 72.1 | 75.4 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $2.00 | $12.00 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $45.00 | |
| $0.03 | $4.80 | 1.0M tokens (~524 books) | $12.22 |