Compare · ModelsLive · 2 picked · head to head
Claude Mythos Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max
Side by side · benchmarks, pricing, and signals you can act on.
Winner summary
Claude Mythos Preview wins on 2/2 benchmarks
Claude Mythos Preview wins 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Leads in knowledge · coding.
Category leads
knowledge·Claude Mythos Previewcoding·Claude Mythos Preview
Hype vs Reality
Attention vs performance
Claude Mythos Preview
#4 by perf·no signal
Qwen3.7 Max
#42 by perf·#2 by attention
Vendor risk
Who is behind the model
Anthropic
$965.0B·Tier 1
Alibaba (Qwen)
$293.0B·Tier 1
Head to head
2 benchmarks · 2 models
Claude Mythos PreviewQwen3.7 Max
GPQA diamond
Claude Mythos Preview leads by +6.6
Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs.
Claude Mythos Preview
94.5
Qwen3.7 Max
87.9
SWE-Bench verified
Claude Mythos Preview leads by +16.6
SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability.
Claude Mythos Preview
93.9
Qwen3.7 Max
77.3
Full benchmark table
| Benchmark | Claude Mythos Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
GPQA diamond Graduate-Level Google-Proof QA (Diamond set) · expert-crafted questions in physics, biology, and chemistry that are difficult even for domain PhDs. | 94.5 | 87.9 |
SWE-Bench verified SWE-bench Verified · 500 human-validated tasks from 12 real Python repositories (Django, Flask, scikit-learn, sympy, and others). Each task requires the model to produce a git patch that resolves a real GitHub issue and passes the test suite. The verified subset eliminates ambiguous tasks from the original SWE-bench. Claude Mythos Preview leads at 93.9%, crossing 90% for the first time in 2026. Opus 4.6 scores 80.8%. The benchmark remains the most-cited evaluation for code-generation capability. | 93.9 | 77.3 |
Pricing · per 1M tokens · projected $/mo at 10M tokens
| Model | Input | Output | Context | Projected $/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | — | |
| $1.48 | $4.42 | 1.0M tokens (~500 books) | $22.13 |
People also compared
Claude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.5Claude Mythos Preview vs Claude Opus 4.6Claude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.4Claude Mythos Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewClaude Mythos Preview vs o3 ProClaude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.5 ProClaude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5 ChatClaude Mythos Preview vs DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale